Sunday, November 24, 2013

In attempt to slam media for not being outraged sooner over the Martin Bashir comments, Greta brings up Andrew Sullivan's questions about Trig. Uh oh!

Here was the actual headline from Gretawire:

Here is a question: was “MSM” outraged when Andrew Sullivan, member of the media, said Trig Palin was not the Governor’s child?

Oh yes, she did just open Pandora's box, and that box is just chick full of things that Sarah Palin SHOULD by all rights want to be locked up forever.

Here is the rest of the post:

I just spotted this tweet…and yes, I have read the recent outrage…but what took so long? How about Andrew Sullivan’s comments? how come the media silence for him? And that was not someone shaming himself with crude language but picking on a special needs child! or how about the thing David Letterman said about the Palin’s daughter when she was about 14? Any outrage? From MSM or women’s organizations or women role models? 

It is one thing to have substantive and ideological differences, but this Bashir level (the gutter) thing really isn’t that new. So what took the media so long? 


 Gee what was it that Andrew wrote way back when?

It seems to me we have two options. It’s possible that Palin simply made up her drama of labor, or exaggerated it for effect, when in fact it was a routine, if rare, pregnancy, and she had mild warnings that the birth may be premature, and she gussied that up into a tall tale of her pioneer spirit, guided by her doctor, who refused to take the NYT’s calls as soon as Palin hit the big time. I think that’s the likeliest explanation, given the sheer world-historical weirdness of the alternative. 

But it’s also possible that she never had that baby at all. I mean, if you read the emails and independent reports above and were asked if this woman were in labor with a special needs child, and that her water had already broken, would you believe it? Just put all the facts in front of you and ask yourself that question. 

So she is either a self-serving drama queen who didn’t realize her story would imply she put her child – and many others on the planes – at great risk and then winged it to make her story more plausible; or she is a fantastic hoaxer and liar at a world class meshugana level that, at some point, will make Weinergate look like a damp squib. 

To my mind, either option makes her unfit for high office, which is all you need to know really. And the fact that she has never been asked about this by any MSM journalist tells you so so much about what motivates the DC press corps. It’s certainly not curiosity. 

I must really thank Greta for allowing us this trip back through Trig Truther memory lane, I almost forgot how much fun calling Palin out on this obvious deception can be.

And if I may blow my own horn a little, I think that almost immediately following that post by Andrew Sullivan, that I offered the two most compelling posts (One from the same day June 2011 and the other from August of 2011) for the argument that Palin did NOT in fact give birth to Trig Palin. (And of course this one did not hurt at all either.)

Ultimately I believe that we, as a community, have  proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that Palin did not in fact give birth to Trig Paxson Van Palin on April 18th. In fact I remain convinced that if Sarah Palin ever grew the backbone to take me to court over my assertion that she is a liar I would have little trouble proving, beyond reasonable doubt, that I am telling nothing but the truth and that she is in fact a liar of almost epic proportions.


However apparently Palin herself  remains blithely unaware that her web of deception has been untangled, and seems confident that she will never be held accountable for the egregious lies that she told to the American people. As further evidenced by this response on Gretawire to Van Susteren's post:

SHP Private • 4 hours ago − Greta - I appreciate how conscientious you are regarding the bigger picture surrounding issues like this. The public appreciates your fairness & willingness to bring to light more background info. You & John have a great day! - Sarah Palin

221 comments:

  1. Anonymous2:34 PM

    "The public appreciates your fairness & willingness to bring to light more background info."

    what background info is she referring to????????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:15 PM

      Here's the thing, back in 2008 Mat-Su Medical Center did not deliver premature infants. They didn't handle those types of births at all since they had no NICU or any neonatologists on staff.

      The policy was to send all premature deliveries to the referral center for the region which was Providence Maternity Center in Anchorage which is less than an hour away from Wasilla/Palmer.

      If Greta was a serious journalist, which apparently she is not, she would ask her friend Sarah to show her any evidence that Sarah did in fact give birth to Trig Palin on April 18, 2008 and report her findings.

      It would only take a few minutes for Sarah to show the birth certificate, invoices and receipts and all the delivery room baby pictures that were taken on that blessed day. Any mother in America has stacks of info about the birth of her child.

      Sarah will never show anything, of course, because she cannot prove what never happened.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:31 PM

      and, Palin says she was induced at Mat-Su

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:37 PM

      She was on a trip out of state at the time, she said, and "just for a fleeting moment I thought, 'No one knows me here; no one would ever know.' ...My amniocentesis came back and then I understood why some people would think they could change their circumstances, just take care of it. Todd didn't even know" the results of the prenatal testing yet, so "no one would know."

      She considered aborting the child she was never pregnant with....

      Delete
    4. Anonymous4:53 PM

      Also, factor in that Dr. Cathy Baldwin Johnson is a family practice physician = not a high risk obstetrician. She had neither the malpractice insurance nor the qualificatons, CME , skill checks to be a high risk obstetrician. There are also at least 38 real high risk obstetricians in the MatSu area, so Palin did not need a family practice physician to be an OB.
      This entire story , if just this angle alone were investigated FOR REAL, would tumble PAlin's hoax!!!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous4:54 PM

      All the bullshit about the phony amniocentesis is to support he claim that she made a conscious decision to have the "baby". If she found out after the birth, she would not have gotten the same level of street cred from the anti-choice crowd.

      Most of her supporters blissfully overlook the fact that a true anti-choice mother would never even have an amniocentesis.

      Delete
    6. Fuck you, McCain!6:00 PM

      Palin also states that she delivered Trig: In TWO. Different. Places...

      Mat-Su is her standard line,

      but most of us have seen the video of her speech where she states she gave birth to Trig in ANCHORAGE.

      Mom was back to work after three days but she can't even remember *where* she had her special-needs baby with a hole in his heart.

      Really, Greta?

      Delete
    7. Anonymous6:44 PM

      And why has no one pursued the fact that Catchy Baldwin Johnson, a highly regarded doctor in the Valley -- completely disappeared after Palin's Wild Ride. ???

      That is SO strange ... as is the fact that any information about Trig is locked away completely and no one has ever seen any birth information.

      Delete
    8. Boscoe8:32 PM

      @6:00 pm: You are exactly right, but don't forget the timing of that story change! It occurred literally a week after a nurse started posting on one of the blogs (maybe this one) about how Mat Su was not equipped for that kind of risky birth and would have airlifted Palin to Anchorage. In fact, they could've lost their accreditation and faced legal proceedings if they had allowed Palin to give birth there.

      THAT was when we started to realize Palin was monitoring the blogs. There were a number of tweaks to her story that came suspiciously soon after specific issues were brought up here and on other blogs.

      To me the changes in her story are almost as damning as the photos/video that clearly show someone who is not pregnant. (my favorite is the one where she's sitting with her legs crossed during an interview and at one point casually bends all the way forward, while sitting, to pick up her bottle of water like it's the easiest thing in the world.)

      Delete
    9. Anonymous5:44 AM

      Mat-Su Regional was not accredited for a birth as such as she described in her book Going Rogue.
      Period.
      Also,too many have commented here that Skank had a tubal ligation after Piper. Or Two-Bull as she describes it. Yes Sarah herself calls it "two-bull"

      Delete
    10. Anonymous5:46 AM

      Greta is not a serious journo or else she wouldn't be at fox. She is a ambulance chaser.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous2:36 PM

    oh and p.s.
    if skank accepts the apology from bashir as she stated on fox today then the trip with matt lauer in wasilly should be back on yes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:41 PM

      Nah, then SarahPac would have to buy Xmas decorations and cook a holiday meal.

      Delete
    2. Sally in MI4:23 PM

      Sarah would have to go home to Alaska...she wants her holidays in the sun.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous2:44 PM

    sweet ! why thanks greta !!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous2:47 PM

    and everyone knows Letterman was cracking a joke about the obviously pregnant Bristol, not a 14 year old.

    although she's been pregnant every other year since she was 14.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fuck you, McCain!6:04 PM

      The joke was *supposed* to be about Alex Rodriguez, but of course, when you can direct a joke to your daughter and say it's about RAPE, why not??

      Sarah, you psycho fu*k!!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:31 PM

      Why didn't she thank Greta for reminding everyone about the Glen Rice affair?? Ooops, I meant one night stand.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:21 PM

      Why lie?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous8:37 AM

      11:21 pm zzzzzzzzzzz..Krusty the Troll.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous8:39 AM

      Bristol is Pregnant now, that is why she is in Arizona again.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous2:50 PM

    guaranteed skank did not write that 'response' back to greta

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous2:54 PM

    Did Sarah Palin breastfeed Trig, or any of her brood, for that matter? the Pit Bull bitch (her claim, not mine) probably rejected the child for its defects.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:54 PM

      I didn't breastfeed either of my children, and I would say the last thing I ever did was reject them. Don't insult the millions of American mothers who never breastfed the children we love more than life itself. But Sarah? Never gave birth to that boy.

      Delete
    2. Sally in MI4:22 PM

      She didn't say YOU rejected anyone; just Sarah, the most unfeeling mother we know.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous7:12 PM

      I remember someone posting something about breast pumps being seen in pictures of the McCain campaign bus...although there was nothing to suggest that Palin was nursing.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous7:14 PM

      Oh...I should add...that -- the breastfeeding stuff was what convinced me the baby was Bristol's, since she had those weird boobies at the convention.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous11:21 PM

      They all were

      Delete
    6. Anonymous5:51 AM

      Ummm, it sure looked like Bristol was breastfeeding...the padding on her dress to hide the leakage?

      Delete
    7. Anonymous7:23 AM

      Sarah quotes on Breastfeeding from the e-mail dump:

      "Yeah! I learned with 4 kids, the longer length of breastfeeding the better. 1st Baby – 3 mon. 2nd Baby – 6 mon. 3rd Baby – 18 mon.4th Baby – 3 years

      Well, yeah, but I hate to publicly admit that Piper wanted boob so long. Can we just say “even longer”? You had to know Piper at that age to understand how weird she was about boob."

      She once mentioned being up at 3am and switching between the blackberry and the breast pump, but to my knowledge that was the one and only comment made re: TriG. You just KNOW that child never bonded with Sarah's fake boobs.

      I seriously doubt she breast fed any child. Even worse, what if she breastfed the first 4 and refused to cuddle and feed the 'retard'.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous3:08 PM

    Greta is on a roll.... I would like her to re-examine the Palin's flight from Texas to Alaska. How is that not the actions of someone that wants to harm the unborn? Sarah did a lengthy interview where she discusses getting Trig back to Alaska.

    O/T
    Where are Sarah's facebook images of Plano, Tx book sales show?

    http://us4palin.com/palinistas-get-surprise-call-tweet-in-texas-meetup/
    Lynda Armstrong book
    http://us4palin.com/teachers-daughter-book-co-creator-why-we-support-gov-palin/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:23 PM

      People that saw Palin on the flight and in the Alaska Airlines Club room did not view her as being pregnant!!! She's a lying fraud!

      Delete
  8. Anonymous3:14 PM

    Where is Trig and why isn't Sarah raising him?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:42 PM

      Trig is in Prop storage and Sarah can't use him anymore because he gets scared when strange people come up to him.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:14 PM

      "strange people"? That would be Sarah aka "Mom"

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:21 PM

      Why do you lie

      Delete
    4. Anonymous5:53 AM

      Anonymous11:21 PM

      Why do you lie
      ****
      What LIE?
      Why do you TROLL?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous8:34 AM

      11:21 PM ZZZZZZZZZ...TROLL UNPATRIOTIC99.

      Delete
  9. abbafan3:14 PM

    Hi Gryphen! It appears that it is open season on the skank idiot; her Faux colleagues have turned on her. For Greta to subtly bring up two juicy morsels of $arah's past indicates something is very rotten in Denmark! Could it possibly be the trip that Greta took to AK in the summer with her husband and Frankie, and wa-wa $arah was not invited?? I believe that the skank bitch royally pissed off Greta, and has an axe to grind with her. Perhaps Roger has declared her persona non grata once again, since she appeared on competing networks, thus violating terms of her second contract. Perhaps they have had enough of the blithering idiot - this may be the beginning of the end of this moron and her dysfunctional brood! I fuckin' hope so!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:29 PM

      Sarah Palin is the face of all things Republican and all things Fox News. Please Roger keep her before the cameras and let her talk and talk and talk.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:44 PM

      Greta wouldn't do anything without Roger telling her to.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous5:01 PM

      No. This is Greta doing Sarah's bidding. You must have missed the part about Mrs. Palin posting a 'thank you' comment on Greta's blog.

      The Palin-Greta mutual benefit society lives on.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous5:21 PM

      No one knows Sarah had a second 'contract' w/FOX. I always suspected they probably paid her by the hour vs a lump sum knowing she could and would do a no show if she felt like it! They knew how tempermental she was and is still today!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous5:54 AM

      Anonymous3:29 PM

      Sarah Palin is the face of all things Republican and all things Fox News. Please Roger keep her before the cameras and let her talk and talk and talk.
      *****
      Yep she will talk her ass right into Jail!
      can't wait!!!!

      Delete
  10. Anonymous3:21 PM

    Thank you Greta!

    http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2013/11/greta-van-susteren-interviews-mike.html

    Can you leave a link to the Square Pants video where Sarah brags about tight abs? Can you leave links on Greta's page to Sarah's miracle belly that went from flat to basketball so very, very fast ? Or ask her to prove how wrong the so-called libs are about specific pictures and documented incidents?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sally in MI4:21 PM

      And ask her how it came to pass that a premature Downs child was released from the hospital and allowed to spend the day at the Governor's office, when all infants are supposed to be protected from contact with non-family members for far longer than three days? Oh, and ask her how she liked nursing him, while you're at. I recall when she was first picked that she was called a 'nursing mother' of a 4 month old, and I, having nursed both my kids fora year (no bottles at all) wondered how she was going to manage the milk leakage, an erratic nursing schedule, and speeches. But lo and behold. Trig was the miracle child. Sarah went off to the AZ ranch to practice her debating skills without the baby. So, nope. She never nursed him. She never had leaky breats (heck, they weren't even post-partum boobs at the convention..Bristol was bigger.) So come on Greta, prove us wrong.
      And while you're at it, do some research on the horrible things that were and are being said about Michelle and Hillary...this is not some vendetta on 'conservative women."

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:55 PM

      Tri-G was so immature and delayed that there is no way in hell he could coordinate sucking, swallowing and breathing to breast feed. YET ANOTHER LIE.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous6:46 PM

      Who can forget $arah parading Trig around when she was back to work after three days of "giving birth." Here was a high risk newborn infant and the Idiot is parading him around the capital building. ... Riiighhhhhtttt...

      Delete
    4. Anonymous6:55 PM

      There is a picture of Trig where you can see a nasal feeding tube. As I recall he is with two or three family members sitting on grass.

      Delete
    5. Cracklin Charlie8:37 PM

      He wasn't a newborn when she took him to work. Except for having to spend time with Sarah, he was fine, because he was probably around a year old, at that time. Same with the summer, 2008 picnic picture of him with the nasal tube. He was born long before April of 2008.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous5:57 AM

      How many TriG's are there? HUH SKANK?
      We saw the HUGE TriG at the RNC and now there are two OTHER TRIGS????
      Gina Loudon supplier of DS babies????

      Delete
  11. Anonymous3:32 PM

    This Greta thing just seems weird to me. Is she working w/Palin to get more attention drawn to Palin? That is how Palin operated when running the government of Alaska as 'quitter' governor - she worked w/others to bring attention to her!

    Why has Greta brought up the birth? Would it be a positive or a negative implying Sullivan was not (or was!) spreading accurate attention to the pregnancy and birth? I

    I'm confused? Why would Greta bring it up now when she could have a long time ago? If the truth comes out about the child that Palin didn't birth, won't it discredit Greta as a journalist as well as others who have kept it hidden? (John McCain and the Republican assistants that worked w/them on the campaign.)

    This Greta thing is off setting!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:37 PM

      Yes it is unsettling ..What's in it for Greta?? Same as Todd saying what's in it for us...Weird ..

      Delete
  12. Anonymous3:34 PM

    Cowabunga!

    What is going on? Greta? Why would she bring this story out of the woodwork now? Has she or John been contacted by someone with new info? We know that after that veterans Saramaritan's Purse event in AK, that Greta has been avoiding Sarah quite evidently, and never even promoted Sarah when they all met at Billy Graham's birthday party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:24 PM

      Greta was at the Billy Graham birthday thing, along with Palin and Toad and others.

      Delete
  13. London Bridges3:34 PM

    Sarah never says she gave birth to Trig. She merely says things like he is mine.

    If only we can determine that over the course of this hoax, she has committed a crime. Then perhaps exposing her would not be a violation of her privacy or and non--disclosure contracts she may have negotiated may be voided.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:13 PM

      wrong - in fact, very recently during her War on Christmas book tour she was bragging on giving birth to Trig.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:57 PM

      Mostly she says he is her child, but she has has has said she birthed him.
      I think we can all sue her for fraud - all of us who have listened to her speeches, and especially those of us who have PAID to listen to a speech. Sue her skank ass for fraud.

      Delete
  14. Anonymous3:35 PM

    Greta says about Sullivan, "And that was not someone shaming himself with crude language but picking on a special needs child!"

    Nooo...Andrew Sullivan wasn't "picking on a special needs child", his statements reflect ONLY on the special needs mother.

    I'll say what I've been saying since the beginning - that Sarah is lying about (1) giving birth to Tri-G or (2) that she's the most callous, uncaring, stupid mother imaginable who at the age of 44 or 45, in her 7th pregnancy, put a known DS high-risk baby's birth at risk. I opt for number 1.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:18 PM

      I've long said that the Wild Ride makes her sound much worse than the idea of adopting a child with DS. Of course, lying to the country about the origins of Trig and faking a pregnancy puts his acquisition in a whole different light, but her supposed actions during labor were just horrific and dangerous.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:25 PM

      Me too. There really are so many questions about the miraculous 6-week pregnancy. Maybe Greta does not know as much about it as many of us do. Someone should tell her about the timelines on what was Palingates and is now Politicalgates. Big mistake, Greta, to raise that issue.
      Beaglemom

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:30 PM

      Just to re-iterate more of the insane points in Palin's birth tale:

      -premature
      -Down Syndrome
      -no medical check and bypassed hospitals after an amniotic fluid leak
      -boarded a transcontinental flight
      -high risk (over 40, 7th pregnancy, history of miscarriages
      -bypassed more hospitals to go to small hospital that did not have a neonatal intensive care unit
      -was induced in a hospital not even rated to handle twins despite the high risk factors

      and... the icing on the cake... had a doctor say there was no reason she couldn't take the flight from Texas!!!

      Delete
    4. Anonymous4:58 PM

      4:30 Do not forget a family practice physciian acting as a high risk Obstetrician.
      Did not happen - could not happen would not happen.

      Delete
  15. Anonymous3:39 PM

    Sorry, but she beat you on this one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:42 PM

      She removed the fake belly so the flight crew didn't notice that a woman who allegedly delivered a baby a few hours later was pregnant.

      She LIED about giving birth. She LIED about leaking fluids. She LIED about considering abortion, although she would have done that in a heartbeat. She'd already had more than one.

      The fake CB J letter put out the night before the election mentions Sarah's FIVE pregnancies, yet she had at least SEVEN.

      I believe TriG is Todd's son by one of his prostitutes.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:20 PM

      If you mean that Palin has been able to keep the MSM from broadcasting the story to the masses, you're right.

      It was astute of Sarah to spread the rumor that she faked a pregnancy to cover up for Bristol. Palin's staff, the AK media, and the MSM...any of them, none of them wanted to potentially look like they were harming a teen.

      If you mean that Palin has been able to keep her hoax secret, you're wrong. The media knows. Politicians in both parties know. And a great many average Americans know. And Palin knows they know. The hoax was the Alpha and Omega of her national political career.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous7:49 PM

      So you admit the pregnancy was a hoax, thanks.
      But she didn't beat us. This lie will not be a secret forever but it doesn't make a whit of difference in my life, though it will in the Ex Mrs Palins. But then again, she is already the laughingstock of the whole world.

      Delete
  16. Anonymous3:47 PM

    If Greta is using this story to bring up discussion on whether conservative women get media attacks on them more than liberal women, she's going about it in an awful way, considering she and Sarah are supposed best buddies.

    Isn't there another way Greta could bring up the subject for comments and discussion without bringing up the questionnable Palin delivery of Trig on GretaWire?

    Folks, like Sarah, said, don't believe in coincidences. There's no doubt that Fox News is poking a stick in a hornet's nest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:22 PM

      There are many other instances that Greta could have mentioned where Palin was insulted by someone in the media. Reaching way back to bring up the Trig controversy is opening that door long after Sarah worked so hard to close it, seal it and build a brick wall in front of it.

      It seems strange that someone who was supposedly a friend of Palin's would stir up that question again. I wonder if Palin did something to really piss off Greta. NOT a smart thing for Palin to do to a person in the media who likely knows a LOT of her secrets!

      Delete
  17. Anonymous3:48 PM

    "How about Andrew Sullivan’s comments? how come the media silence for him? And that was not someone shaming himself with crude language but picking on a special needs child! "

    Only an idiot could interpret Andrew Sullivan's comments on the birth of Trig as "picking on a special needs child". Sullivan, in no way, disparaged the child. His argument is that either of the possible birth scenarios DISQUALIFIES Sarah Palin as a candidate for high office.

    Greta was trying to hide yet again behind the shield of a Down Syndrome baby.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fuck you, McCain!8:07 PM

      Well, she *is* a Scientologist who works for Fox so...

      Delete
  18. Anonymous3:52 PM

    How old was Trig suppose to be in this picture?
    http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2011/06/voice-of-god-artifice-of-sarah-palin.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:15 PM

      photo was taken in May 2008, so he would have been a couple of weeks old.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:27 PM

      "But to this day, because my son Trig was born prematurely at seven and a half months and I didn't tell anyone I was pregnant for seven months" ~ Faulkner University 2010

      She can't even keep up with her own lies. She told the world she was pregnant on March 6th. The child was allegedly born April 18th. That's 6 weeks, not two. I understand why she's so confused though. She thinks she told the world she was pregnant when she had stomach liposuction on March 26th.

      That's almost 2 weeks. Then again, she thinks the kid was born in Anchorage. She can't remember when or where he was born. No big deal. It's not just TriG. She's done that with all her kids.


      Also, too, she claimed her doctor told her in December the child would have DS. "I've never had problems with my other pregnancies, so I was shocked," said Palin. This from a woman with at least two 'wite-outs'...... They were not problems with a pregnancy though. Maroon.

      She said her water broke before she left for TX. That's a claim that she gave birth and nothing else. UNLESS she meant her bra.....ROFL

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:39 PM

      Does not look like a DS baby to me.

      So TriG will be five in May?

      ANd Tripp is six now.

      Shouldn't they both be in school? Piper diaper also too?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous4:53 PM

      The "white outs" were written into her book to explain the abortion bills she received and I'm sure were unearth during a medical background check by McCain's staff.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous11:22 PM

      They both ARE in school.

      Delete
    6. Man, even then Sarah's hands were scary claws.
      I have never seen a healthy person whose hands look like that.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous7:10 AM

      @4:39 - it does look like Tripp is older than TriG, doesn't it? Yet, Sarah's claim is TriG is 5 years old, Tripp is 4 years old.

      4 year olds don't have second teeth. Check out Tripp's top toof flippers. They don't match the rest of his teeth.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous8:29 AM

      11:22 PM Home School does not count. They are afraid to register them in Public School, because their
      Birth and Hospital shot records would have to be reviewed.

      Delete
  19. Anonymous3:54 PM

    Thanks Gretle for bring up Mrs. Palin's lies about TRIG. Now lets do some rill investigative journalism, shall we?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous4:07 PM

    Rupert might have his own hot mess, so a Palin fiasco will distract from this:

    Relations between Tony Blair and Rupert Murdoch 'collapse' after claims of meetings with ex-wife Wendi Deng

    www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/relations-between-tony-blair-and-rupert-murdoch-collapse-after-claims-of-meetings-with-exwife-wendi-deng-8960921.html

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous4:09 PM

    Gryphen is right when he says Pandora's box has been opened.

    For Greta to revive the Trig/Palin hoax story and toss it out at prime time is BIG. It will set all the tongues twittering of the talking heads on tv . You go, Andrew Sullivan!

    And the half term, half wit invites more scrutiny from Greta! lol

    This is $arah's worst nightmare unraveling right before our eyes.

    Step right up, ladies and gents and get ready to watch the show! This is the one we've been waiting for ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:27 PM

      It's the Greatest Show On Birth!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:00 PM

      What a fun TG weekend this could be!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous5:07 PM

      Clever 4:27!

      Delete
    4. Anonymous5:22 PM

      5:07 It would actually be a great name for a Palin book about her faked pregnncy

      Delete
    5. Anonymous3:08 AM

      5:22
      I agree!!!

      Delete
    6. Anonymous5:29 AM

      Bristol is too weak, Track too loaded but Willow could turn her anger into something liberating and productive. "Greatest Show On Birth!" is a winner title for her ghostwritten book.

      Too bad that Willow continues to be lazy and happy to be bribed with shopping at the MOA and who knows what for these crapo book sales. Someone else may steal their thunder and come out with the "Greatest Show On Birth!"

      How many nanny's and surrogate parents do the Palins use for all the cubs?

      Delete
    7. Anonymous7:07 AM

      let's see - Bristol has a full time nanny because she's mentally deficient and loose as a goose.

      Willow has a full time nanny because she's of the rockers crazy and violent. She might spill about the children - including hers.

      Piper lives with her grandparents.

      TriG lives with his real parents.

      Tripp, Trenton, Grace share Bristols' caretaker along with Willow's boy.

      Not sure where the 'godchild' went. The little mixed race baby was given to Bristol for 2 months when he was a newborn and filming with the Massey bros. (that's her story). AS if anyone would give the bimbo a new baby to care for.

      Delete
  22. Anonymous4:24 PM

    Alaska Ear/ Anchorage Daily News reports that $arah did not file for/receive a PFD check again, for the 4th year running.. But Todd, Trig and Piper did file/receive checks.

    It's pretty obvious that Todd is the MommyDaddy in the Paylode household.

    Sarah - stop using Alaska as a prop!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:51 PM

      And it's pretty obvious that Todd and Sarah don't live together.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:45 PM

      It's pretty obvious that they are divorced and she moved away from her children.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:23 PM

      It's obvious you are all stupid and in need of lives.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous5:42 AM

      Mark Begich Knows what is on record in Alaska. Marriages, births, divorces and all else.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous6:12 AM

      If she is divorced from him she can testify to save her skanky skin!

      Delete
    6. Anonymous7:03 AM

      it's obvious 11:23 is a Palin....rofl

      Delete
    7. Anonymous8:24 AM

      @11:23 PM ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ...Fake Patriot Traitor.

      Delete
  23. Anonymous4:25 PM

    Andrew Sullivan, who's witty and wise, owns and operates his own blog. His thoughts are influential, but he's no one's idea of a "mainstream" journalist. Either Greta's just not very clued in, or she's bringing up a 2 1/2 year-old blog post in order to drag Sarah out into the light.
    In any event, for the "MSM" to hound Sullivan into an apology, they'd first have to investigate the truth of his hypothesizing. Greta's asserting that Sullivan purposely lied. It's up to Sarah and Greta to prove him wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:44 PM

      Or someone, someone big has been sniffing around the story and Greta is going on the offense for Granny Sarah, it would go along with screechy grannys "going after vulnerable children".
      But Sarah could have ended this all yrs ago will the showing of the BC but she couldn't.
      BTW Roger is slimey enough that he doesn't care where the story comes from. LOL, her own Faux Snooz will be the story to light.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:09 AM

      I suscribe to Andrew's new gig - and wonder if iin the near future he is going to go all out on babygate? Maybe Greta has wind of this and is trying to preempt and discredit already?

      Delete
  24. Anonymous4:29 PM

    Gee, Greta, why would you bring this up NOW? You and John ARE complicit in this lie and it must be coming to a head in some way, shape, or form, especially for the Heifer herself to reply to you.

    Someone's knees are shaking, faux journalist, hope you lie awake for days!

    Happy Holidays!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous4:33 PM

    We are going to find out what that looming iceberg was. The one that probably caused her to quit. We will know before another Happy Holidays is done.

    Gryphen already knows and you will too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:49 PM

      Why can't you or Gryphen tell us now? I promise I won't tell anyone, LOL.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:49 PM

      rollout schedule details would be nice... so I can plan popcorn purchases

      Delete
    3. Anonymous7:30 PM

      The iceberg roll out schedule will allow her to hide from the questions during the remainder of the book tour.

      Two stops left the first week of December?

      Greta brings up Sarah's bogus looking pregnancy miracle baby?

      Black Friday this week?

      Have your popcorn on hand soon.

      I will say that so many people knew about the iceberg that TPTB couldn't do a real coverup. They just had to do the nobody brings it up or ever talks about it coverup.

      A lot of Republicans must know. From Captain Zero himself on down. Todd? Probably not.

      This is probably one reason she spends so little time in Alaska at Republican and Tea Party events. Always wondering "I wonder if they know?"; talk about uncomfortable.

      lol.
      Just telling the truth would have prevented that.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous9:20 PM

      You are implying that this an Alaska "issue". (... From Captain Zero himself on down... ??? Gryphen, any comment?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous9:27 PM

      It's interesting that Jake Tapper asked Sarah, "How's Trig doing?" and she answered by describing learning about Trig's DS when Trig was 12 weeks along. She never did say how Trig was doing. Now, we have Greta raising questions about Trig. Then, Sarah was asked why Todd wasn't along on the book tour. "Oh, he's up there in Alaska, taking care of Trig." But then, Todd showed up at the Mall of America, along with Piper and Willow. So, who IS watching Trig? (I know, Bristol, who seems to look after Trig a lot. He happened to be at Bristol's, late at night, in a photo that Sarah posted showing both Tripp and Trig watching Ted Cruz's filibuster.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous12:22 AM

      It's not really an Alaskan issue, and many will partially blame the vice presidential nomination for her believing the nonsense the campaign spread. Specifically, that she was competent, among other things. Her own incompetence and failure to change her ways sunk her political career. If she hadn't been nominated this mistake would never have happened.

      Why she will never run? This in addition to everything already out there.

      She will probably quit the book tour.

      We will be looking at you Lou Sarah.




      Delete
  26. Anonymous4:34 PM

    okay so greta had mike tyson on and let him explain his innocent comments about skank and make a reference to skank and glen rice.
    now greta is tweeting about trig truthers and letting it just be out there.

    something tells me that roger ailes has let them loose! everyone knows that you can't say a word against skank or ever suggest anything untowards about her or her family but one can innocently bring these up and let them go where they will and have guests on to talk about her.

    even the wallace interview today left skank saying she accepted bashir's apology so there goes any more argument from her side about boycotting nbc.

    maybe roger is giving everyone enough rope to hang the skank.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous4:37 PM

    Here kitty kitty kitty....

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous4:44 PM

    Mrs. Palin, there is medicine for herpes.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous4:45 PM

    Holy shit, batman. First thing I thought after reading this plus what an early Christmas present.

    Scorpie

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous4:45 PM

    No outrage because the public puts the Palins up there with the Kardashians, Lohans, etc. You can't be a media whore who is proud to have no political correctness, then be upset when you get it back.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:11 AM

      No outrage if a Kardashian or Lohan wore a strap on belly and made money from a fake pregnancy?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:41 AM

      none whatsoever -whether it's Kardashian or Beyonce, it doesn't matter. They were not trying to gain a high political position based on their lies.

      Beyonce had a miscarriage and didn't want to go through that again. Kardashian will probably start a maternity line of clothing.

      Palin lied about a DS child to appeal to fundies. Plus it would partially explain the multiple children running around the compound.

      Delete
  31. Anonymous4:46 PM

    Greta pings my lesbidar. The man tailored shirts and blazers remind me of the field hockey coach at the awards assembly. The fact that she is a Scientologist may explain this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:12 AM

      lol
      You are funny. I did laugh even though I shouldn't/ Lesbidar!!
      We all have that gym teacher/field hockey coach in our past to which we can relate your comment!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:10 AM

      3:12 Funny you should mention that. As soon as I read 4:46pm's comment, my 7th grade phys.ed. teacher's face popped right up.
      I believe you are correct. We all (most anyway) have at least one in our past.

      Delete
  32. Anonymous4:59 PM

    Oh irony of ironies if its Fox News that once and for all exposes the Trig hoax!

    GVS's question has the same feel as when the Anchorage Times "helpfully" asked SP to clear up the rumors about Trig. She went OFF on the Times; her non-answer to GVS may be just a prelude to going off on Fox too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:39 AM

      If Fox News exposes the Trig Hoax it will be for ratings.

      Delete
  33. Anonymous5:02 PM

    Alice in Wonderland said that things were getting "curiouser and curiouser." Same thing for Sarah and Trig. First, Jake Tapper asked Sarah in a CNN interview, "How's Trig doing?" Instead of answering, "He's just fine," Sarah went into a long story about how she learned that he had Down Syndrome at 12 weeks gestation.

    Then, in her interview with Chris Wallace, Sarah launched into her Mother Grizzly mode, ready to defend all of the vulnerable children who are under attack. Oh, she says that she can take the "shots," but, the vulnerable children have no one to protect them. Who is she talking about?

    Sarah has never said a kind word for any children at all, not for poor kids with families on food stamps, for whom their best meal is the school lunch. Sarah has never said one word about child trafficing or child labor in third world countries. I haven't seen Sarah donate time or money to DS organizations, speaking of vulnerable children. So, who is she so busy defending? The only one who comes to mind is Trig. Now, we are treated to Greta taking on Sarah's cause, arguing against Andrew Sullivan who has questioned Sarah's unusual pregnancy.

    Let's be clear here. There are photos of Sarah, pregnant with Track and another one of her expecting Piper. In both photos, Palin is as big as a house, her back is arched to support the extra weight that she is carrying in front. She never looked pregnant, not even when she surprised everyone when she announced her "pregnancy" with Trig at 7 months, at the beginning of March, 2008. I know someone who saw Palin two weeks after claiming to have given birth to Trig. My friend has seen many other pregnant women, and her thoughts were that there was no way that the slim Sarah Palin had just given birth to a baby 2 weeks previously. Palin also claimed to be pumping milk, but none of the photos of her taken after the middle of April, 2008 show a busty woman. And, we have seen the Belmont Girls. That's what Palin should have looked like when she claimed she was pumping milik. (Bristol looked that big 5 months after Trig was born.)

    What's all of this defensive stuff about Trig all of a sudden? Are there inquiring reporters on the trail of a good story? Has anyone seen Trig? How IS he doing? Where IS he-- Arizona or Alaska-- or somewhere else with caregivers????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anita Winecooler6:29 PM

      Agree. Sadly, it was mostly comments on this and other blogs bringing up how poorly Trig was being treated on the first bus tour and campaigning. Wasn't dressed for the weather, out in parking lots and crowds, during the first outbreak of H1N1 flu.
      But he's the only child in the family who got a "letter from his "Creator"" birth announcement.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:00 PM

      correction - Bristol only looked that big at the RNC when she had a towel stuffed in her bra. Two weeks prior, she was tiny and did not appear to be pregnant at all. Most likely because Tripp had been born 6 -9 months earlier.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous9:21 PM

      @Anita: I think that they can't afford to drag Trig along anywhere there are cameras and media. Earlier this year, Chuck Sr. gave a radio interview where he said that Trig could say three or four words, wasn't toilet trained, and liked to watch cartoons on TV with the sitter. That doesn't sound like therapy. And, it doesn't sound as if Palin wants people to see Trig that way, if Chuck Sr's description is accurate. They could drag Trig along on the first book tour, prop him up on someone's hip and show him off to the crowd. Yes, it was terrible that they woke him up at 11 PM and dragged him outside in the cold weather in a t-shirt and diaper. I remember a photo of two women (one was Sally) trying to feed a screaming Trig who threw himself back in a major tantrum. No, they can't take Trig along now, not unless they can teach him to wave and say something when people say hello to him.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:06 PM

      @5:02 PM, This! "Then, in her interview with Chris Wallace, Sarah launched into her Mother Grizzly mode, ready to defend all of the vulnerable children who are under attack."

      I thought it odd too when Wallace asked her about Bashir's apology and she went on her weird rant about how people better not attack defenseless children.

      Greta's article seems to dovetail with Palin's interview statements. I don't know what they're up to, but why are they both going on about defenseless children when Bashir's take down was aimed directly at Palin??

      Are the doing some kind of preemptive damage control?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous5:09 AM

      Are the doing some kind of preemptive damage control?

      It looks that way.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous5:36 AM

      My theory is that TriG is Track's kid and lives with the parents of his former girlfriend, Britta.

      She disappeared late winter, early spring in 2008, allegedly to travel.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous6:19 AM

      Remember Shay had massaged her and she wasn't preg and had recently had lipodissolve done. Hence the "pillows".
      That's why the staff was Horrified when she announced she had a baby they did lipodissolve on her!!! Not for pregnant women!

      Delete
  34. LoveAndKnishesFromBrooklyn5:07 PM

    I've said it before, when the ones pulling the strings are through with her, all the rotten refuse will come pouring out of the dumpster. With low sales and small crowds for her Christmas leaflet (hey, maybe they ain't bussing the riff and the raff to her appearances like they used to, eh?), cutting one signing short and not appearing at another, the fact that the Bashir remark barely made a blip on the MSM radar, and now this tidbit from Gravella, is it possible that it's starting as we speak?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cracklin Charlie5:21 PM

      The only question remaining is..."Who will get to sell the television rights for the train wreck"?

      They would have to try to recoup their investment, wouldn't they?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:06 AM

      Leaflet- love that! Another interpretation could be TP or maxi-pad.

      Delete
  35. Anonymous5:12 PM

    This really strange coming from bff Greta.Where's trig?

    ReplyDelete
  36. Almost as good as putting the 3/26/08 museum picture up on Fox TV, but this is enough too. Now I'm convinced someone at Fox is out to settle scores. Palin does not want curiosity about Trig fostered right now when she's trying to shop her shitty book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:01 AM

      THAT is the photo that does it for me. She is not 7 months pregnant in that photo. Some other photos might be debatable but that single photo convinced me that she is a low-life, scheming, craven fraud.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:47 AM


      Sarah Palin to Greta Van Sustren: I appreciate how conscientious you are regarding the bigger picture surrounding issues like this. The public appreciates your fairness & willingness to bring to light more background info. You & John have a great day!

      Don't ya know Van Sustren will have a reasonable discussion about that photo? Being so conscientious and all regarding the bigger picture. Van Sustren will be interviewing Cathy Baldwin-Johnston, M.D. any day now in all fairness & willingness to bring to light more background info.

      Delete
  37. Anonymous5:31 PM

    So Palin is behind Greta's blog post. And it comes after her interview and references to vulnerable children. Palin who berates the media about 'makin' stuff up' got Greta to lie about Letterman and Sullivan to make a case that the media attacks Sarah's children.

    It's all super weird. Reminds me of when Sarah had Piper watch Greta's show. I can't help but think this post was meant for Piper/Willow/Bristol/Track. Did one of them show signs of going rougue and this was meant to close ranks around them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:50 AM

      The cowards are sure to stay with the strategy of using 'vulnerable children' to protect their yellow belly lies. 'Vulnerable children' make 'wonderful family' props.

      Delete
  38. Anita Winecooler6:23 PM

    Thank You, Martin Bashir! If not for the "Darby Dose" historically accurate and factually true statement, Greta would never have opened this Pandora's Box of deceitful, despicable lies and frauds Sarah has gotten little attention about in the press recently. Did Roger suggest it, or did you actually think this up yourself? Either way, you broke it, you own it.
    Let's see Sarah's "steel spine", now the onus is on Sarah to prove it's NOT true. .
    Odd that she'd toss in that wet sloppy kiss reply to Greta after the tyson interview. If a librul "male says something, she's in a tizzy,
    She calls Nancy Pelosi a "Dingbat", yet a conservative female rehashes the past..... she friggin' thanks them!!!!

    .

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anonymous6:58 PM

    But see, Palin is qualified to be VP of the US because she has a globe behind her. See? She's got foreign relations experience.
    LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:13 PM

      She went to a foreign country for health care when she was a child.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:19 PM

      More qualifications than Biden has for politlcal office

      Delete
    3. Anonymous5:32 AM

      @11:19

      :poop:

      Delete
    4. Anonymous6:25 AM

      Anonymous11:19 PM

      More qualifications than Biden has for politlcal office
      ******
      ES&D Treasonous troll! Fuck off also,too!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous8:16 AM

      11:19 AM Compare Joe Biden's Education and Experience to Sarah Palin's LACK of Education and Experience, then come back with your slimey tail between your legs and egg on your face. Palin has 5 years experience at Grifting. Prior to that, others did her job for her, because she did not know how to do her job.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous8:47 AM

      11:19: How funny. Palin was 9 years old when Biden began his political career. Of course, he was NEVER the mayor of a small town with a population of less than 4,500 people. Guess that disqualifies him for you eh? I'm so glad VP Biden never has to depend on a ragtag bunch of panty sniffers like Palin does cause like cotton candy they are nothing but a bit of showy poof.

      Delete
  40. Anonymous7:00 PM

    baawaaahhhh
    this is all the event news posted at the harper collins website for skank's book tour:

    All Events
    Promoting Good Tidings and Great Joy
    Friday, December 06, 2013
    REVEREND BILLY GRAHAM LIBRARY


    Saturday, December 07, 2013
    10:00 AM
    BARNES & NOBLE
    4802 Valley View Blvd NW Roanoke, VA 24012

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:27 PM

      Mrs. Palin sure is spending a lot of time away from her family at this "traditional" time. Unless "traditional" for the Palins is grifting. It is.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:12 PM

      Virginia? I wonder if that so-called "gentleman" will be well enough to be wheeled over there to see Sarah. I wonder if he actually exists, or if he is part of the cast of characters that a wannabe screen writer has created over there to drive up donations and fan interest.

      Delete
  41. Anonymous7:28 PM

    Gray skin is not your best color choice, Gretle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:10 PM

      It looks like she has the same cheek bones that Sarah has. For fun, google Greta's photos in Google Images, key words Greta Van Susterin's plastic surgery, before and after.

      Delete
  42. Anonymous7:28 PM

    When Greta and other journalists, who show righteous indignation at anyone dredging up rumors and innuendo about a female conservative politician, they act like nothing's amiss for a female politician who might fake a pregnancy to get elected.

    Any woman who could scheme to fake a pregnancy with her co-workers and friends and the public, would be immediately be accused of being mentally challenged or a psychopath, or a very disturbed person. If a female VP candidate were to scheme a fake pregnancy to get elected, what does that tell people like Greta? Do they condone that kind of behavior?

    Is the fact that a liberal journalist who asks questions about why a loving mother, a governor of a State, with 4 other children, would take such great risks to her unborn child, just so she could give a speech???????? What is so wrong with a journalist asking that question??????? Wouldn't the voting public want to know the person they put into power in the Vice President's seat be of sound mind? What kind of VP of the United States (who is on the record for telling the story of her reckless birth to the AK press) would be trusted and relied upon after giving that story?

    The fact that Joe Biden and President Obama were elected IS the fact that they didn't risk injury or death to their unborn children and brag about it to media. That's the reason curious journalists want answers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cracklin Charlie8:29 PM

      Greta's in on the hoax. She was a facilitator. She knows the answers.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:09 PM

      Agreed, Charlie, Greta and Sarah have a mutual benefit society. The use Samaritan's Purse for charity photo ops-- odd because Greta is supposed to be a Scientologist, too. Greta gets nice ratings when Sarah announces that she'll be on that show, and Greta doesn't bother Sarah with those Katie Couric gotcha questions. Greta's husband, John Coale, set up Sarah's PAC and her legal defense fund while she was still governor. The legal defense fund was an ethics violation and Coale claimed that he set it up under the law in Washington DC, not Alaska's law. (Ignorance of the law is no excuse, and Coale is a lawyer to boot). Greta drooled over Todd's snow machine. The four of them seem to be BFF's.

      Delete
  43. Anonymous7:45 PM

    All the money Palin earned during and after her stint as VP candidate telling the world, through paid speeches, that she birthed Trig would be major fraud.

    We hear about people pretending they have cancer or a major disease and ask for donations and when caught, are charged with a crime. Imagine in the history of the U.S., what would ensue if a VP candidate was discovered fraudulently making a false claim to pro-life voters? And digging in her heels and accusing media and bloggers of lying about her? All those accusations she threw at those who were digging for the truth, and all the mischief and misery she caused, well, none of that would be forgotten. It wouldn't just go away, a discovery like that would be THE biggest political hoax of the century.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:06 PM

      I agree that Sarah lied and she's a fake. But the only crime that she might have committed would be claiming insurance for maternity check-ups that never took place. If lying was a crime, they should have locked up Dick Cheney for telling us that there was no doubt that Iraq had WMD when he knew that they didn't. As for Sarah's donations, they are given to a PAC which is governed by a body that has no teeth. As long as she talks about politics somewhere and endorses a candidate every now and then, she is entitled to the donations. She has told other lies in addition to Trig's story, but most of our politicians lie to some degree or another.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:19 AM

      (9;06
      I disagree. She made lots of speeches that went into her own coffers, now her PAC.
      I intentionally shelled out $150 to hear her speak once. I will sue her for fraud and emotional distress (my hero lied to me lol!!!) . I have lots of lawyer friends at the ready!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:02 AM

      who cares if it's a crime or not? She's committed plenty of crimes without including the lie about TriG.

      She needs to be EXPOSED for the liar she is to everyone, forever humiliated and banned from the media.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous4:04 AM

      AND hoaxing a nation may not legally be a crime, but bilking groups for $100K speaking fees for her lies is a crime. It's called FRAUD.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous6:20 AM


      There are more crimes then you can count around this fraud. They are kept under the radar and the media is influenced to not go with certain stories or to do any investigative journalism.

      With public knowledge CBJ was the one to approve a pregnant woman on a flight that would have endangered an unborn, the mother and the entire flight. No one calls out CBJ. Greta isn't serious or she would make certain CBJ was interviewed. Sarah would ensure that CBJ talked to her, of course neither Sarah or Greta would go there. They do not want a central player like CBJ to talk and she is loyal to their crimes and is shut up. The crimes and lies are only growing and doing more harm. These criminals are traitors and working against America and Americans.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous6:59 AM

      We only have SP's word that CBJ approved anything. I don't believe anything that viper says.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous7:22 AM

      6:59 AM CBJ submitted a letter. If she did not approve of her good name being injected by Todd or Sarah she would say something. Her silence is approval. Do I believe the Palins? No. There was nothing for CBJ to approve for a pregnant woman on the Alaskan Airline flight.

      As far as the Palin's 'official' version, YES, CBJ did give her approval to endanger the life of an unborn. A grand jury will dispose her, then she can say under oath that she didn't approve the flight. She can restore her good name as someone who cares about children that are raped and abused.

      CBJ would not rape a child and she would not put a child's life in danger by approving the Palin flight. Or would she? The public must know for certain what happened.

      Anyway you slice it, CBJ needs to restore her good name. She has no business pretending to care about rape victims. She is smack in the middle of all kinds of questions about trafficking and illegal adoptions the way she aligned her name with Todd and Sarah Palin. Be sure to read "Boys will be Boys", ask lot's of questions, insist on more investigation and facts.

      Why would a local rape expert be so friendly and protective of a local pimp?

      Delete
    8. Anonymous9:12 AM

      Pretty sure the CBJ letter was a forgery. The best defense against psychos is silence.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous9:26 AM

      If I hired a speaker that sold them self as the birth parent of a Down syndrome child I would want the speaker to be the birth parent, what they say they are is the product they are selling. Sarah Palin's hoax is not some old 2008 hoax. It is continuing each and everyday. The Palins bilk money out of people in many different ways. Much of it is based on the news of Sarah going to the Mat-Su Valley to give birth to a Down syndrome child. This week the Palins are selling a War on Christmas book that is not so much about Christmas. It is claimed the book was written by Sarah Palin the mother who gave birth to a Down syndrome child in the Mat-Su Valley or Anchorage (depending on which Sarah Palin you are inclined to believe). It is alleged Sarah is caring for the Down syndrome child as any other parent would do and the child has medical coverage and he has Sarah's version of mysterious theraphy for a Down syndrome child. Authentic parents of Down syndrome children would care about the truth and want to know about a hoax and those who are involved in this hoax for money or power. The Viagra men may only care about her sexy toothpick legs and they are fine being hoaxed because they like her as their ideal of sexy. The elderly ladies, who have no care about seeing Sarah shrinking as her head grows large and resembling a tragic eating disorder, they do not care about truth or her health. They have a fake xtian cult to cover for. Let them be fooled and money stolen from them to support the hoax. For those that do care about this run away criminal scam, let the hoax be revealed.
      It won't happened without perseverance. Carry on truth tellers. Find the way to get these frauds deposed.

      Delete
    10. Anonymous10:04 AM

      CBJ is allowing her name to be on the letter. She owns it whether it is a forgery or not. If she knows it is fake and she is silent she is culpable. The same is true for her part in the WILD RIDE story that Sarah talks about.

      CBJ is guilty of conspiring with criminals who are pulling off a nation wide crime. CBJ is a co-conspirator. Her criminal history is massive.

      To think of the vulnerable children they are putting in harms way because of the co-conspirator that has a front as a rape expert.

      As if the co-conspirator, CBJ, isn't fully aware of Todd and the Anchorage Police. CBJ would be interested in pimping and prostitutes in her small town. If she were an decent human being she would expose the scum and how the pimp family works all their rackets. Some of which focus on 'vulnerable children'.

      No wonder Palin is working the 'vulnerable children' angle.

      Delete
  44. Anonymous8:28 PM

    If the wild ride story is true, then people like Greta should stop covering for Palin and report how dangerous it was.
    My water broke. Dr said to go to the hospital immediately. I was in labor and high risk. They went up my vagina, attached a heart monitor my baby's head. His heartbeat started going dangerously low. He was delivered by emergency C-Section, alive but the cord was wrapped around his neck 3 times. He was strangling. (He's grown and fine, though.) had I been on a plane and pulled Palin's stunt, my son would have died.
    The press never reported the stupidity of Sarah's actions. And they should have. Whether it is true or not, the danger of what Palin supposedly did should have been examined. To me, it is just criminal--and certainly would have been (if the story is true) and her child had died. My son spent the night in the NICU and he didn't have a hole in his heart. A baby with that would be in NICU.
    I've never believed her story because of my own experience.
    Anybody who covers for her should be ashamed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:00 PM

      Adding to the reckless nature of Sarah's story was that she claimed that she knew ahead of time that the child had DS and was going to be premature. Sarah claimed to have done her research about DS, so she would have known that their likelihood of birth defects was higher than other births. If her story was truth, it spoke to someone with a careless disregard for life-- considering that Palin claims to be pro-life.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:21 AM

      Yep - with my FIrst baby and AT TERM, my water broke and the docotr gave me ONE HOUR to get tot he hospital. I begged for that hour to get a shower and fix my hair lol!!
      A seventh pregnancy, high risk, DS fetus, ruptured membranes like Sarah - no fucking docotr would say "It was not unreasonable to fly".
      Fuck that., The answer is RIGHT THERE in CBJ. Supeona (sp?) CBJ!!!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous3:37 AM

      Or someone who was not pregnant at all but pretending to be. The one sure fact was that Trig was DS; everything else was made up and the story, typical of one of Sarah Palin's, just got crazier and crazier. I think the media never went after it because it involved "motherhood" and who would ever question that.
      Beaglemom

      Delete
    4. Anonymous5:30 AM

      CBJ specializes in child rape victims. That's all I needed to know. The mother of TriG was not Sarah.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous6:05 AM

      Greta could have a sit down discussion with Sarah and Dr. Cathy if the 'wild ride' story were true. Instead, Dr. Cathy behaves ashamed of her letter and part in this history and fraud. Dr. Cathy will not speak up even to stand up for Sarah (not that she could). It is alarming that a doctor would behave by hiding and not saying zip about this. You don't have to reveal anything confidential to comment on matters.

      Dr. Cathy is one GIGANTIC RED FLAG. Her silence says plenty.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous9:30 AM

      A search of the Alaska data base for licensed general practioners shows no Cathy Baldwin Johnson.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous10:23 AM

      What happened? As gov palin gave Baldwin Johnson.an award.

      Delete
  45. Anonymous9:13 PM

    Lowell Bud Paxson is part of the Tri-g story. Vicki Iseman is another part of the story and a Paxson lobbyist who was 'close' to John McCain. Sarah included her Attorney's name(Van) and Paxson in Tri-g's full name. Trig Van Paxson Palin. COINCIDENCE? Tri-g was an arrangement by the Christian Fundamentalists to give Palin Pro Life cred. McCain was 'forced' to accept Palin as a running mate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous2:25 AM

      Palin was picked as the running mate before McCain was, to make the fundies happy. If you look at Pics of Sarah when she became governor and then when the announcement was made you will see she had extreme plastic surgery during that short time. BTW during that same period of time Tawd also had a major surgery making his face look less Yu'pik

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:25 AM

      Time to revisit Tri-G's name - it is a narrative:
      Tri-G Paxson Van Palin:

      The retarded kid (Tri-g = trisomy G = DS_, thought up or provided by Paxson, was supposed to make PAlin VP (Van Palin)

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:13 AM

      Palin's Attorney at that time was Van Flein.

      Delete
  46. Do I get to puke now ?

    ReplyDelete
  47. Anonymous10:23 PM

    I have been convinced since Palin was annouced as McCain's running mate that she did not give birth to Trig. Bristol was the one breast feeding at the time she was covered up with a blanket holding baby Trig, Levi knows the truth and that is why he is outcast and called a deadbeat dad. I'm not saying Trig is Bristol's baby just that he is not Sarah's birth child. Media has not reported on it or questioned it but it is the biggest hoax ever by someone whom was unqualified to have run as a VP. Women everywhere should be disgusted by her faked motherhood with her stint as the VP nomination. Had any investigation into her claims been done by journalists we would not be having to discuss her stupid ass today. I blame the media for allowing it to continue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:26 AM

      One really has to question why Palin was even considered for VP. Okay, she was the elected Gov of Alaska but she was a complete idiot, Then she supposedly gives birth to a child with DS four months before being announced.. the iciing on the cake was oh by the way, her daughter is knocked up and expecting. Who on friggin earth thought this was a good idea when there were many other highly qualified Republican woman out there!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:07 AM

      So many alarm bells should have been ringing before the "Little Shop of Horrors," kept revealing themselves.

      Delete
  48. Anonymous10:34 PM

    Her eyes are as cold and evil as they come......that's the Scarah I know and detest.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Anonymous2:46 AM

    One telling bit of evidence would be: Were Sarah and Todd ever together in the same space long enough to have conceived Trig? That would be Jul 2007?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:05 AM

      July 2007 she was embroiled in the beginnings of Dairygate.

      Delete
    2. Cracklin Charlie11:16 AM

      First off, Trig is not Sarah's biological child, so where Sarah was makes no nevermind. But...

      I think July of 2007, or thereabouts, was when Trig was born. So, I think he was probably conceived around October or November, 2006, about the time his Grandma Sarah was busy campaigning for, and getting elected governor of Alaska.

      The Republicans (Bill Kristal ?) were coming to Alaska in summer 2007, to get to know the governor.

      Dairygate, too, huh? Unmarried daughter with hidden special needs infant, major grifting projects, attention from nationally known political operatives, same daughter quickly becomes pregnant a second time...what a summer that must have been!

      Delete
  50. Anonymous3:19 AM

    Come on Gryphen, now is your opportunity to have the title of the story in giant font at the top of the page not just a links buried in your post. Time to publicize the shit out of these lies again. Any of you social media savvy folks tweet Greta, FAUX News, etc.....links to the wild ride story? Come on people, get it out there!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:52 AM

      That is what it takes. Persistence and organizing.

      Delete
  51. London Bridges4:28 AM

    The book is about "The War on Christmas." Christmas is about the virgin birth. Sarah's Trignancy was/is a virgin birth. The book may be about the war on Sarah's virgin birth or faked pregnancy, the Trignancy. Sarah thinks of herself as the Second Coming. Sarah had to spice things up. Her ratings were down. Let the war games begin! Sounds too crazy? No crazier than Sarah and the Palins.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:48 AM

      "Whoever gave birth to Trig, it couldn't be Sarah. Remember, she had said that she 'not only had her tubes just tied, she had them cut, and the ends burned - or some such measure to make SURE she wasn't going to be having more babies. 

      "Didn't she have it done during the delivery of piper??"

      All of us who have kids that went to school with Sarah's kids know to be absolute factual gospel truth: Sarah Palin had a tubal ligation after her last baby (Piper) was born."

      She then took several days off work- more than she took when she "had" Trig. She bitched at Todd afterward saying HE should have gotten the snip since it was so much easier for men.""Trig may actually have BEEN born at 7.5 months....but he wasn't born in April '08, and he sure as HELL did not issue forth from the tied, cut, and burned fallopian tubes of Sarah Louise Heath Palin."

      Delete
  52. Anonymous4:54 AM

    Can't find this on Greta Wire this morning. Made to take it down?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:54 AM

      Still there.

      http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2013/11/24/here-is-a-question-was-msm-outraged-when-andrew-sullivan-member-of-the-media-said-trig-palin-was-not-the-governors-child-click-to-read/

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:56 AM

      It was up here
      http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2013/11/24/here-is-a-question-was-msm-outraged-when-andrew-sullivan-member-of-the-media-said-trig-palin-was-not-the-governors-child-click-to-read/

      Read the comments...

      Delete
  53. Anonymous5:52 AM

    How did Sarah Palin get pregnant with Trig from Todd? Didn't Todd use condoms and wrapped the used condoms in facecloths?

    ReplyDelete
  54. Anonymous6:54 AM

    A Dr. who is responsible for anyone in Sarah's alleged condition taking a trek (as described to frozen Ak) must answer for their part in the child abuse. Dr. Baldwin-Johnson may be a rape abuse expert but she would also know about other abuse.

    According to the Palin version, Dr. Baldwin-Johnson abused the unborn Trig when she approved the high risk flight. No one as much as questions her suspect behavior.

    GVS sucks for her part in keeping up this big lie.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Anonymous6:56 AM

    She had a tubal ligation after Piper (the damn baby) was born, Todd slept on the recliner and told his whore she was the light of his life the day before SP announced her run for VP.

    He may be the father of TriG, but not because he had sex with Sarah.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:11 AM

      ms. Tripp was subjugated and lrostitute by Todd Palin, do you really have to call her a whore

      Delete
  56. Anonymous8:05 AM

    Thank you Greta!

    http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2013/11/greta-van-susteren-interviews-mike.html

    The Sponge Bob Sarah tape cannot be viewed too often, it is classic Palin. The square pillow is square! She didn't even attempt for something more like a baby. Hilarious Sarah at her most hilarious!

    ReplyDelete
  57. Anonymous8:35 AM

    Greta -
    I appreciate how conscientious you are regarding the bigger picture surrounding issues like this. The public appreciates your fairness & willingness to bring to light more background info. You & John have a great day!
    - Sarah Palin

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_XckT2h8g80s/TC4Dm9dbK0I/AAAAAAAAAzE/MmcZai0sPDc/s1600/Sarah+Palin+patting+belly+-+Copy.jpg
    http://i33.tinypic.com/mt70d4.jpg
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_y1obSLk0ax4/SgiWTxsKiqI/AAAAAAAABkQ/LKMCui-DRI4/s400/sp+elan+frank+2.jpg

    http://www.lauranovakauthor.com/uploads/5/3/7/4/5374397/193054.jpg?669
    http://bojack.org/images/palin3-26-08L.jpg
    http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/4e381ae169bedd746c000041/new-sarah-palin-photos-show-her-looking-dramatically-un-pregnant-a-few-weeks-before-son-trig-was-supposedly-born.jpg

    http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2013/11/24/here-is-a-question-was-msm-outraged-when-andrew-sullivan-member-of-the-media-said-trig-palin-was-not-the-governors-child-click-to-read/

    ReplyDelete
  58. Anonymous10:31 AM

    That 'Letter' from Dr. Cathy Baldwin Johnson does not say what date Tri-g was born, and it does not say that Sarah Palin gave birth to Tri-g. It merely states that Tri-g was born at 35 weeks, and that he went home with his mother. Nowhere in that Farce of a medical verification is there proof that Sarah Palin gave birth. McCain has seen all of the Medical Records, and he is stuck with the cover up. Dr. CBJ sent a generic letter to avoid falsifying information. Ironically, Dr. CBJ had an office on 'PIPER' St. Sarah Palin will name her kids after anything.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cracklin Charlie10:59 AM

      What kind of plane did Curtis Menard fly?

      Delete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.